See the work before you make the call.
Give hiring teams stronger evidence than a resume or interview alone: a realistic task, a recording of the process, and a score tied to the rubric.
The useful signal
Practical ability, made visible.
Ask for the work the role actually requires.
Review the process, not only the final answer.
Keep responsible human judgment at the center.
The review path
From task to evidence to next step.
One orderly record of how a candidate approached the work, what the rubric measured, and where a reviewer still needs to apply judgment.
Set the work in context.
Send a role-relevant computer task that takes roughly 30 minutes to 3 hours.
See the work as it happens.
Capture a recording of the candidate’s process and the artifacts they create.
Keep the rubric in view.
Use AI-assisted scoring against task-specific criteria, with the evidence attached.
Make the call with context.
Give a human reviewer the final say, with a clearer record of what happened.
02 / Evidence in motionA better hiring conversation
Not a black-box score. A trail you can follow.
The product is designed to make expectations, rubrics, scores, and supporting evidence understandable to the people making the decision and the people doing the work.
Transparent evaluation for technical and knowledge-work hiring teams.
Human review
Let the signal sharpen the conversation.
AI can help organize a task-specific review. It should not replace the person who knows the role, the context, or the responsibility of making a hiring decision.
Talk through your process
03 / Human decisionStart with the role
Tell us what good work looks like.
We are building a clearer way to collect practical evidence. Share the role, the task, or the part of your current process that needs a closer look.